Top.Mail.Ru

Тромбоцитопения у больных многопрофильного стационара и возможные пути оптимизации ее оценки

Информация только для специалистов в сфере медицины, фармации и здравоохранения!

 8530

Тромбоцитопения у больных многопрофильного стационара и возможные пути оптимизации ее оценки

Журнал "Медицинский совет. Оториноларингология" № 20 2017г.


Н.Ю. Семиголовский1,2, д.м.н., профессор, Т.В. Вавилова3, д.м.н., профессор, В.А. Кащенко1,2, д.м.н., С.Н. Семиголовский2, А.А. Сапегин1, к.м.н.
1 Клиническая больница №122 им. Л.Г. Соколова Федерального медико-биологического агентства России, Санкт-Петербург
2 Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет
3 Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр им. В.А. Алмазова Минздрава России, Санкт-Петербург

Аннотация

Анализ распространенности тромбоцитопении в многопрофильном стационаре, где пролечивается около 25 000 больных в год, показывает, что от 1,15 до 1,45% пациентов имеют опасное снижение тромбоцитов менее 100 x 109/л. Так, 40,2% из них (в среднем 127 человек в год) получают гепарин и могут потенциально рассматриваться как больные, подозрительные на гепарининдуцированную тромоцитопению (ГИТ). Своевременное выявление таких пациентов, применение двух правил – 4Т и «100–5–100» – позволяет не пропустить больного с развитием ГИТ, вовремя перейти на альтернативные антикоагулянты и при необходимости прекратить промывание венозных катетеров раствором гепарина. Такая тактика позволяет уменьшить количество пациентов, получающих гепарин и имеющих тромбоцитопению ниже 100 х 109/л, почти в 3 раза как в общебольничных, так и в реанимационных отделениях за 3 года использования указанной тактики.

Ключ. слова: тромбоцитопения, гепарин-индуцированная тромбоцитопения (ГИТ), лекарственная тромбоцитопения, гепарины, иммунодиагностика, тромбоз, оригинальное Правило экспресс-диагностики ГИТ «100-5-100»

N.Yu. Semigolovskii1,2 , MD, Prof., T.V. Vavilova3, MD, Prof., V.A. Kashchenko1,2, MD, S.N. Semigolovskii2, A.A. Sapegin1, PhD in Medicine
1 Sokolov’ Hospital №122 of Federal Medical and Biological Agency
2 Sankt-Petersburg State University
3 Almazov’ National Medical Research Centre

Thrombocytopenia in the structure of hematological disorders in patients of a multiprofile hospital and possible ways to optimize its evaluation

Analysis of the prevalence of thrombocytopenia in a multidisciplinary hospital, where it is treated about 25,000 patients a year, shows that from 1.15% to 1.45% of patients have threat reduction platelets less than 100x109/l. 40,2% of them (on average, 127 people per year) receive heparin and can potentially be seen as patients that are suspected to heparin-induced
thrombocytopenia (HIT). Timely identification of such patients, the use of two rules – 4T and «100–5—100» allows you not to miss the patient with the development of HIT, time to switch to alternative anticoagulants and, if necessary, to stop the flushing of venous catheters with heparin solution. This tactic allows to reduce the number of patients, receiving heparin and
thrombocytopenia below 100 х 109/l, almost 3 times as took place among hospitalized and patients in intensive care units in 3 years of using the mentioned tactics.

Keywords: thrombocytopenia, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), drug-induced hrombocytopenia, heparins,immunodiagnostics, thrombosis, the original «Rule» of HIT diagnostics «100-5-100».

Тромбоцитопения у больных многопрофильного стационара и возможные пути оптимизации ее оценки

Скачать в формате PDF


Список литературы

1. Вагнер Д.О., Вербицкий В.Г., Шлык И.В., Курыгин Ал.А. Негативные последствия антисекреторной терапии и способы их предупреждения у пострадавших с обширными ожогами. Вестник хирургии им. И.И. Грекова, 2015, 174(3): 108-112.
2. Дуткевич И.Г., Сухомлина Е.Н., Селиванов Е.А. (2010). Основы клинической гемостазиологии. СПб.: ООО ИПК Коста, 2010. 144 с.
3. Енисеева Е.С., Власюк Т.П. Острый стенттромбоз у больного с гепарин-индуцированной тромбоцитопенией. Сибирский мед. журнал, 2013, 5: 130-131.
4. Arepally GM, Ortel TL. Clinical practice. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. N. Engl. J. Med., 2006, 355(8): 809-817.
5. Arnold DM, Nazi I, Warkentin TE, Smith JW, et al. Approach to the diagnosis and management of drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia. Transfus. Med. Rev., 2013, 27(3): 137-145.
6. Aster RH. Drug-induced immune cytopenias. Toxicology, 2005, 209: 149-153.
7. Bangia AN, Kamath N, Mohan V. Ranitidineinduced thrombocytopeniа: a rare drug reaction. Indian J. Pharmacol., 2011, 43: 76-77.
8. Barilla D, Martinelli GL, Cotroneo A, Romano A, Iacopino P. Thrombosis due to Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia in Cardiac Surgery: is Fondaparinux an Effective Treatment? J Cardiovasc Dis Diagn, 2016, 4(3): 240-245.
9. Boshkov LK, Warkentin TE, Hayward CP, Andrew M, Kelton JG. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: clinical and laboratory studies. Br J Haematol, 1993, 84(2): 322-328.
10. Cuker A, Gimotty PA, Crowther MA, Warkentin TE. Predictive value of the 4Ts scoring system for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood, 2012, 120(20): 4160-4167.
11. Curtis BR. Drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia: incidence, clinical features, laboratory testing, and pathogenic mechanisms. Immunohematology, 2014, 30(2): 55-65.
12. Datta I, Ball CG, Rudmik L, et al. Complications related to deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in trauma: a systematic review of the literature. J Trauma Manag Outcomes, 2010, 4: 1-21.
13. Fabris F, Ahmad S, Cella G, Jeske WP, Walenga JM, Fareed J. Pathophysiology of heparininduced thrombocytopenia. Clinical and diagnostic implications - a review. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2000, 124(11): 1657-1666.
14. Gentilini G, Curtis BR, Aster RH. An antibody from a patient with ranitidine-induced thrombocytopenia recognizes a site on glycoprotein IX that is a favored target for drug-induced antibodies. Blood, 1998, 92(7): 2359-2365.
15. Greinacher A, Selleng K. Thrombocytopenia in the Intensive Care Unit Patient. ASH Education Book, 2010, 2010(1): 135-143.
16. Greinacher A, Warkentin ThE. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. New York, N.Y: Marcel Dekker. 2004: 106-107.
17. Jang I-K, Hursting MJ. Thrombocytopenia when heparins promote thrombosis: review of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Circulation, 2005, 111: 2671-2683.
18. Kang M, Alahmadi M, Sawh S, Kovacs MJ, LazoLangner A. Fondaparinux for the treatment of suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a propensity score-matched study. Blood, 2015, 125(6): 924-929.
19. Levi M. Platelets in sepsis. Hematology, 2005, 10(Supplement 1): 129-131.
20. Linkins LA, Dans AL, Moores LK, et al. Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. CHEST Journal, 2012, 141: e495S-e530S.
21. Motokawa S, Torigoshi T, Maeda Y, et al. IgG-class anti-PF4/heparin antibodies and symptomatic DVT in orthopedic surgery patients receiving different anti-thromboembolic prophylaxis therapeutics. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2011, 12: 22-34.
22. Pearson M, Nadeau Ch, Blais N. Correlation of ELISA Optical Density With Clinical Diagnosis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia. A Retrospective Study of 104 Patients With Positive Anti-PF4/Heparin ELISA. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost, 2014, 20(4): 349-354.
23. Pouplard C, May M-A, Iochmann S, et al. Antibodies to Platelet Factor 4-Heparin After Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Patients Anticoagulated With Unfractionated Heparin or a Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin: Clinical Implications for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia. Circulation, 1999, 99: 2530-2536.
24. Salter BS, Weiner MW, Trinh MA, et al. HeparinInduced Thrombocytopenia: A Comprehensive Clinical Review. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2016, 67: 2519-2532.
25. Selleng K, Warkentin TE, Greinacher A. Heparininduced thrombocytopenia in intensive care patients. Crit Care Med, 2007, 35: 1165-1176.
26. Wilke T, Tesch S, Scholz A, et al. The costs of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a patientbased cost of illness analysis. J Thromb Haemost, 2009, 7: 766-773.
27. Schindewolf M, Steindl J, Beyer-Westendorf J, et al. Frequent of-label use of fondaparinux in patients with suspected acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)-findings from the GerHIT multi-centre registry study. Thrombosis research, 2014, 134: 29-35.
28. Warkentin TE. New approaches to the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Chest, 2005, 127: 35-45.
29. Warkentin TE. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2015, 41(1): 49-60.
30. Warkentin TE. Clinical picture of heparininduced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and its differentiation from non-HIT thrombocytopenia. Thromb Haemost, 2016, 116(5): 813-822.
31. Warkentin TE, Aird WC, Rand JH. Plateletendothelial interactions: sepsis, HIT, and antiphospholipid syndrome. Hematology (Am Soc of Hematol Educ Program), 2003: 497-419.
32. Warkentin TE, Greinacher A. Management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Curr Opin Hematol, 2016, 5: 462-470.
33. Warkentin TE, Greinacher A. So, does low-molecular-weight heparin cause less heparin-induced thrombocytopenia than unfractionated heparin or not? Chest, 2007, 132(4): 1108-1110.
34. Warkentin TE, Heddle NM. Laboratory diagnosis of immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Curr. Hematol. Rep., 2003, 2(2): 148-157.
35. Warkentin TE, Kelton JG. Temporal aspects of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med, 2001, 344: 1286-1292.
36. Warkentin TE, Sheppard JA, Heels-Ansdell D et al. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in medical surgical critical illness. Chest, 2013, 144(3): 848-858.




Последние статьи