Особенности лазерной коагуляции «винных пятен» (случаи из практики)

 524

Особенности лазерной коагуляции «винных пятен» (случаи из практики)

Журнал "Амбулаторная хирургия" №1-2, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21518/1995-1477-2019-1-2-64-71

Белянина Елена Олеговна, кандидат медицинских наук, врач хирург-онколог, дерматокосметолог, Фрау Клиник «Клиника пластической хирургии и косметологии профессора Блохина С.Н. и доктора Вульфа И.А.»

Чрескожная лазерная  коагуляция (селективный фототермолиз) в настоящее время является «золотым стандартом» лечения «винных пятен». Однако достичь полного удаления сосудистого поражения удается крайне редко, а в 20% случаев отмечена резистентность к лазерному воздействию.

В статье приводятся клинические случаи лечения «винных пятен» у двух пациентов. На основе собственного опыта и данных литературы проведен анализ результатов лечения, побочных эффектов применения лазеров, а также рассмотрены альтернативные перспективные  методы лечения.

Sulodexide efficacy in the treatment of patients with chronic lower limb vein diseases of C1-C3 clinical classes according to CEAP

Belyanina Elena Olegovna, Candidate of Medical Sciences, surgeon-oncologist, dermatocosmetologist, FRAU KLINIK «Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology of Professor Blokhin S. N. and Dr. Wolf I. A.»

Percutaneous laser coagulation (selective photothermolysis) is currently the «gold standard» for the treatment of «port-wine stains». However, complete removal of the vascular lesion is rarely possible, and in 20 % of cases there is resistance to laser attack. 

The article presents clinical cases of «port-wine stains» treatment in two patients. On the basis of own experience and literature data the analysis of treatment results, side effects of lasers application was carried out, and also alternative perspective methods of treatment were considered.

Загрузить файл статьи в формате PDF


Источники / References

  1. Дан В.Н., Сапелкин С.В. Ангиодисплазии (врожденные пороки развития сосудов). М.: Вердана, 2008.
  2. Mulliken J.B., Glowacki J. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: a classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69:412-422.
  3. Enjolras O. Vascular malformations. In: Bolognia J.L., Jorizzo J.L., Rapini R.P. et al. Dermatology. London: Mosby; 2003:1615-1629.
  4. Мишнев О.Д., Павлов К.А., Дубова Е.А., Щеголев А.И. Ангиодисплазии (сосудистые мальформации): Пособие для врачей. М.: Издательство РГМУ, 2008. 44 с.
  5. Бокерия Л.А., Морозов К.М., Серов Р.А., Ронами В.Г. Гемангиомы и сосудистые мальформации: классификация, клиника, диагностика, лечение, ошибки (на примере клинического наблюдения). Анналы хирургии. 2008;6:76-80.
  6. Adamic M., Troilius A., Adatto M., Drosner M., Dahmane R. Vascularlasers and IPLs: Guidelines for care from the European Society for Laser Dermatology (ESLD). J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007;9:113-124.
  7. Hagen S.L., Grey K.R. et al. Quality oflife in adults with facial port-wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76 (4):695-702.
  8. Landthaler M., Hohenleutner U. Laser therapy of vascularlesions. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2006;22:324-332.
  9. Stier M.F., Glick S.A., Hirsch R.J. Laser Treatment of pediatric vascularlesions: port wine stains and hemangiomas. Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:261-285.
  10. Woo S., Ahn H.H., Kim S.N., Kye Y.C. Treatment of vascular skin lesions with the variable-pulse 595 nm pulsed dyelaser. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:41-48.
  11. Greve B., Raulin C. Prospective study of port wine stain treatment with dyelaser: comparison of two wavelengths (585 nm vs 595 nm) and two pules durations (0,5 milliseconds vs 20 milliseconds). Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34:168-173.
  12. Eubanks L.E., McBurney E.I. Videomicroscopy of port-wine stains: Correlation oflocation and depth oflesion. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44:948-951.
  13. Renfro L., Geronemus R.G. Anatomical differences of port wine stains in response to treatment with pulsed dyelaser. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:182-188.
  14. Jasim Z.F., Handley J.M. Treatment of pulsed dyelaser - resistant port wine stain birthmarks. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:677-682.
  15. Yu W., Ma G., Qiu Y. et al. Why do port-wine stains (PWS) on the lateral face respond better to pulsed dyelaser (PDL) than those located on the central face? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:527-535.
  16. Ackermann G., Hartmann M., Scherer K. et al. Correlations betweenlight penetration into skin and the therapeutic outcome followinglaser therapy of port-wine stains. Lasers Med Sci. 2002;17:70-78.
  17. Burns A.J., Navarro J.A. Role of laser therapy in pediatric patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124 (Suppl):82-92.
  18. Reyes B.A., Geronemus R. Treatment of port-wine stains during childhood with the flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;23:1142-1148.
  19. Cantatore J.L., Kriegel D.A. Laser surgery: an approach to the pediatric patient. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50:165-184.
  20. Wenxin Yu., Jiafang Zh. et al. Port-wine stains on the neck respond better to a pulsed dye laser than lesions on the face: An intrapatient comparison study with histopathology. J.Am. Acad. Derm. 2019;80 (30):779-781.
  21. Lorenz S., Scherer K., Wimmershoff M.B., Landthaler M., Hohenleutner U. Variable pulse frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser versus flashlamp-pumped dye laser in the treatment of port wine stains. Acta Derm Venerol. 2003;83:210-213.
  22. Chan H.H., Chan E., Kono T. et al. The use of variable pulse width frequency doubled Nd:YAG 532 nm laser in the treatment of port-wine stain in Chinese patients. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:657-661.
  23. Faurschou A., Togsverd-Bo K., Zachariae C., Haedersdal M. Pulsed dye laser vs. intense pulsed light for port-wine stains: a randomized side-by-side trial with blinded response evaluation. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160 (2):359-364.
  24. Ho W.S., Ying S.Y., Chan P.C., Chan H.H. Treatment of port wine stains with Intense Pulsed Light: a prospective study. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:887-891.
  25. Bjerring P., Christiansen K., Troilius A. Intense pulsedlight source for the treatment of dyelaser resistant port-wine stains. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2003;5 (1):7-13.
  26. Yang M.U., Yaroslavsky A.N., Farinelli W.A. et al. Longpulsed neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnetlaser treatment for portwine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;52:480-490.
  27. Izikson L., Nelson J.S., Anderson R.R. Treatment of hypertrophic and resistant port wine stains with a 755 nmlaser: a case series of 20 patient. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41 (6):427-32.
  28. Chapas A.M., Eickhorst K., Geronemus R.G. Efficacy of early treatment of facial port wine stains in newborns: a review of 49 cases. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39:563-568.
  29. Geronemus R.G. Long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnetlaser treatment for port wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:923.
  30. Alster T.S., Tanzi E.L. Combined 595-nm and 1,064-nmlaser irradiation of recalcitrant and hypertrophic port-wine stains in children and adults. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:914-918.
  31. Ozdemir M., Engin B., Mevlitoglu I. Treatment of facial port-wine stains with intense pulsedlight: a prospective study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2008;7 (2):127-131.
  32. Orten S., Waner M., Flock S., Roberson P., Kincannon J. Port-wine stains. An assessment of 5 years of treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:1174-1179.
  33. Michel S., Landthaler M., Hohenleutner U. Recurrence of portwine stains after treatment with the flashlamp-pumped pulsed dyelaser. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143:1230-1234.
  34. Huikeshoven M., Koster P., de Borgie C. et al. Redarkening of port-wine stain 10 years after pulsed-dyelaser treatment. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1235-1240.
  35. Коспанов Н.А., Азимбаев Г.С., Юхневич Е.А. Врожденные ангиодисплазии. Клинические протоколы Министерства здравоохранения Республики Казахстан. 2015.
  36. Ozluer S.M., Barlow R.J. Partial re-emergence of port-wine stain following successful treatment with flashlamp-pumped dyelaser. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2001;26:37-39.
  37. Willey А., Anderson R., Azpiazu J.L. et al. Complications of laser dermatologic surgery. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2006;38:1-15.
  38. Chapas A.M., Fazeli A., Goldberg D., Geronimus R. Sequential, dual wavelength treatment of port wine birthmarks: pilot study [abstract]. Lasers Surg Med. 2006; Suppl:18-21.
  39. Bae Y.C., Alabdulrazzaq H., Brauer J.A., Geronemus R.G. Treatment of recalcitrant port-wine stains (PWS) using a combined pulsed dyelaser (PDL) and radiofrequency (RF) energy device. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:321-326.
  40. Tremaine A.M., Armstrong J., Huang Y. et al. Enhanced port-wine stainlightening achieved with combined treatment of selective photothermolysis and imiquimod. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66:632-641.
  41. Chen J.K., Ghasri P., Aguilar G. et al. An overview of clinical and experimental treatment modalities for port wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:289-304.


Хирургия